What this lesson teaches
I can judge how well ASEAN built stability, security and economic cooperation in the region over time.
Syllabus 9174, Paper 2, Theme III, Learning Outcomes. evaluate the outcomes of ASEAN's efforts in building regional stability and security and promoting regional economic cooperation over time
Make a guess
In 1968 the Philippines and Malaysia quarrelled over Sabah and broke off relations. How do you think ASEAN helped?
- It ruled that Sabah belonged to the Philippines.
- It sent peacekeeping troops to Sabah to keep the sides apart.
- Regular meetings kept the dispute from becoming a war.
Show the answer
Regular meetings kept the dispute from becoming a war.
ASEAN achieved little in economics early on, but it stopped quarrels between members from turning into fighting.
In its first years ASEAN achieved little in economics but helped stop quarrels, such as over Sabah, from becoming wars.
ASEAN's early years were slow, and people called it the "Foreign Ministers' Club". Its main success was stopping things going wrong. Regular meetings kept quarrels between two members from turning into fighting.
The Sabah dispute tested it. In 1968 the Philippines and Malaysia quarrelled over the Philippine claim, and broke off relations. ASEAN meetings were disrupted. The USA chose to stay out, so that ASEAN members would handle their own affairs. Relations were restored in 1969.
In November 1971, ASEAN set the aim of a Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality (ZOPFAN). Members hoped to keep the great powers from meddling in the region. The USA was cutting back its role in Asia and opening ties with China.
During the Second Indochina War, ASEAN took no military role as a group. Members acted differently. Thailand and the Philippines sent troops to help the USA in Vietnam, while Indonesia stayed non-aligned. ZOPFAN stayed a hope rather than a fact.
- Foreign Ministers' Club
- Nickname for the early ASEAN.
- Sabah dispute
- 1968-69: Philippines and Malaysia suspend relations.
- ZOPFAN
- Kuala Lumpur, November 1971.
Real examples to use
Sabah quarrel, 1968 to 1969
After the Corregidor killings of March 1968 exposed a Philippine plan to stir trouble in Sabah, Malaysia suspended relations in September 1968. They were restored at an ASEAN ministers' meeting in December 1969.
ZOPFAN, 27 November 1971
Meeting in Kuala Lumpur, ASEAN foreign ministers declared the aim of a zone free from great-power interference, though it had no means of enforcement.
Members in the Vietnam War
Thailand had more than 12,000 troops in South Vietnam by 1969 and the Philippines about 2,000 in a civic action group, while Indonesia stayed non-aligned.
Worked example: ASEAN's responses during the Second Indochina War
How did ASEAN respond to the Vietnam War?
- Collectively: no military role; ZOPFAN in 1971 as a long-term aim.
- Individually: Thailand and the Philippines supported the USA; Indonesia was non-aligned.
- Why: ASEAN's objectives and members' different national interests.
- Judgement: a cautious, limited response reflecting ASEAN's weakness.
Watch out for this
ZOPFAN made Southeast Asia neutral in 1971.
ZOPFAN was a declared aim. Foreign bases and alliances remained, so the region did not become neutral.
Check your understanding
What did ZOPFAN aim to do?
- Keep Southeast Asia free from great-power interference
- Bring the region into the Warsaw Pact
- Create an ASEAN army to defend the region
Show the answer
Keep Southeast Asia free from great-power interference
Right. It was declared in November 1971.