Different people, different responses

G3 Full History - syllabus K330, 2027

What this lesson teaches

  • I can judge how colonial rule changed politics, the economy and society in Southeast Asia after 1870, and who gained or lost.

    Syllabus K330, Extension of European Control in Southeast Asia, Learning Outcomes. Evaluate the impact of European influence on Southeast Asia after 1870.

  • I can weigh up how far officials, rulers, chiefs and traders helped European powers extend their control.

    Syllabus K330, Extension of European Control in Southeast Asia, Learning Outcomes. Assess the roles of individuals and groups in the extension of European influence.

Make a guess

When Britain took more control in the Malay states, how do you think local people responded?

  1. They resisted British rule together from the start.
  2. In different ways, depending on what each stood to gain or lose.
  3. They welcomed British rule because it brought peace and order to trade.
Show the answer

In different ways, depending on what each stood to gain or lose.

Abdullah sought British help, chiefs who lost taxes resisted, and merchants liked safer trade. One person could back one policy and oppose another.

People could support some British policies and oppose others, depending on what they stood to gain or lose.

Working with colonial rulers is called collaboration. Not everyone responded the same way. Abdullah sought British help to become Sultan. Chiefs who lost control of taxes had reasons to resist. Merchants liked safer trade, while workers still faced harsh conditions. One person could back one policy and oppose another.

The sources come from Britain's House of Commons, where MPs debated policy. After Birch was killed, MPs asked how Britain had become so involved. Officials had reasons to stress order and trade. Critics questioned British power and cost.

These speeches show what each speaker wanted MPs to think. They do not directly show what people in Malaya experienced. Compare them with the treaty and other evidence.

Collaboration
Working with colonial rulers.
House of Commons
Where British MPs debated Malaya after Birch's death.
Source check
Ask what each speaker wanted listeners to believe.

Worked example: Compare two speakers

In 1876, Ernest Noel MP and James Lowther, the government spokesman, both discuss the Resident's power.

  1. Similar: both admit the Resident had more power than simple advice.
  2. Different: Noel blames the rule to follow advice; Lowther says officials in Malaya went further than London approved.
  3. Lowther may want to protect the government from blame. That is an inference, not proof he was wrong.

Watch out for this

A British official defending policy cannot be useful evidence.

A biased source is still useful. It shows what the official wanted people to believe, and can be checked against other evidence.

Check your understanding

Why might chiefs in Perak resist the Resident?

  1. They lost control over taxes and revenue.
  2. They wanted the Resident to take more power.
  3. Britain had promised them full control of taxes.
Show the answer

They lost control over taxes and revenue.

Yes. Losing income gave them strong reasons to resist.

Sources and context

Background reading for this chapter.

  • Hansard, Commons debate on Perak, 26 May 1876

    Ernest Noel MP, House of Commons debate on Perak, 26 May 1876. Concise paraphrase of his argument.

  • Hansard, Commons debate on Perak, 26 May 1876

    James Lowther, parliamentary under-secretary for the colonies, replying in the same Commons debate, 26 May 1876. Concise paraphrase.

  • Control over taxation

    Sir Charles W. Dilke MP, asking the colonial secretary a question in the House of Commons, 7 June 1878; paraphrase.

  • The colonial secretary replies

    Sir Michael Hicks-Beach, secretary of state for the colonies, replying to Dilke in the same Commons sitting, 7 June 1878; paraphrase.

  • Hansard, Commons debate on Perak, 26 May 1876

    An original cartoon drawn for these notes in the style of a British satirical magazine cartoon of 1876, when Parliament was debating the war in Perak that followed the killing of the first Resident, J. W. W. Birch, in November 1875. It is not a copy of a real cartoon.

  • Hansard, Commons debate on Perak, 26 May 1876

    Extract from the speech of Ernest Noel MP opening the House of Commons debate on the murder of J. W. W. Birch and British intervention in the Malay Peninsula, 26 May 1876. Hansard, House of Commons, vol. 229. Parliamentary copyright, reproduced under the Open Parliament Licence.

  • Hansard, Commons debate on Perak, 26 May 1876

    Extract from the speech of Sir George Campbell MP, a former senior official in India, in the same House of Commons debate, 26 May 1876. Hansard, House of Commons, vol. 229. Parliamentary copyright, reproduced under the Open Parliament Licence.

  • Hansard, Commons debate on Perak, 26 May 1876

    Extract from the reply of James Lowther, Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies, in the same debate, 26 May 1876. Hansard, House of Commons, vol. 229. Parliamentary copyright, reproduced under the Open Parliament Licence.

  • the Colonial Secretary answers a question, 1878

    Extract from the answer of Sir Michael Hicks-Beach, Secretary of State for the Colonies, to a question from Sir Charles Dilke MP asking how Perak now differed from an annexed province, House of Commons, 7 June 1878. Hansard, House of Commons, vol. 240. Parliamentary copyright, reproduced under the Open Parliament Licence.

The Wise Otter

Getting your study space ready